Re: [patch] minor syctl fix in vsyscall_init

2005-04-22 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:16:48PM +0200, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > On 13 Apr 2005 20:29:13 +0200, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:45:18AM -0700, Matt Tolentino wrote: > > > > > > Andi, > > > > > > If CONFIG_SYCTL is not enabled then the x86-64 tree > > > fails

Re: [patch] minor syctl fix in vsyscall_init

2005-04-21 Thread Benoit Boissinot
On 13 Apr 2005 20:29:13 +0200, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:45:18AM -0700, Matt Tolentino wrote: > > > > Andi, > > > > If CONFIG_SYCTL is not enabled then the x86-64 tree > > fails to build due to use of a symbol that is not > > compiled in. Don't bother compi

Re: [patch] minor syctl fix in vsyscall_init

2005-04-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:45:18AM -0700, Matt Tolentino wrote: > > Andi, > > If CONFIG_SYCTL is not enabled then the x86-64 tree > fails to build due to use of a symbol that is not > compiled in. Don't bother compiling in the sysctl > register call if not building with sysctl. Thanks. Actua