Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 17:29, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:20:47PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> Let me point out that the usual process would be
[...to do it in one go]
>> Well, a couple of RFC's have already been sent with this regard.
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 17:29, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:20:47PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > > freezer_exempt() as of now does what its name says. I.e, exempt the
> > > thread from all kinds of freeze chills.
> > >
> > > But with more su
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:20:47PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > freezer_exempt() as of now does what its name says. I.e, exempt the
> > thread from all kinds of freeze chills.
> >
> > But with more subsystems using the process freezer, the exemption needs
> > to be ev
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> freezer_exempt() as of now does what its name says. I.e, exempt the
> thread from all kinds of freeze chills.
>
> But with more subsystems using the process freezer, the exemption needs
> to be event specific. There may be threads which should not be frozen
> for say kpr
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:06:05PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> > Add try_to_freeze() calls to the remaining kernel threads that do not
> >> > call
> >> > try_to_freeze() already, although they set PF_NOFREEZE.
> >> >
> >> > In the future we are going to rep
Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > Add try_to_freeze() calls to the remaining kernel threads that do not call
>> > try_to_freeze() already, although they set PF_NOFREEZE.
>> >
>> > In the future we are going to replace PF_NOFREEZE with a set of flags that
>> > will be set to indicate in which situations the
Hi!
> > Add try_to_freeze() calls to the remaining kernel threads that do not call
> > try_to_freeze() already, although they set PF_NOFREEZE.
> >
> > In the future we are going to replace PF_NOFREEZE with a set of flags that
> > will be set to indicate in which situations the task should not be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Add try_to_freeze() calls to the remaining kernel threads that do not call
> try_to_freeze() already, although they set PF_NOFREEZE.
>
> In the future we are going to replace PF_NOFREEZE with a set of flags that
> will be
8 matches
Mail list logo