Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Comments? Eric?
Sorry -EBUSY.
The trylock on call_lock is a recent thing (.22), added to keep panic
from hanging. It probably makes more sense to move bust_spinlocks(0)
down a few lines in kernel/panic.c and to test oops_in_pro
(reposting this.. somehow left LKML off the TO/CC list)
Mark Lord wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
..
The code path on i386 should be:
machine_power_off
native_machine_power_off
machine_shutdown(); (which disables the other cpus)
smp_call_functi
Reposting this.. somehow left LKML off the TO/CC list.. (thanks Andrew!)
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
- It could be that we changed the initialization order.
- It could be that we changed the set
3 matches
Mail list logo