On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 11:44 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Two general concerns, we appear to be eliminating both the force_take
> and the retry.
>
> The force_take only occurs if TID==0, and that is covered here in a
> cleaner way, so I believe we are go
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 11:44 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Subject: futex: Simplify futex_lock_pi_atomic() and make it more robust
> From: Thomas Gleixner
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:45:41 -
>
> futex_lock_pi_atomic() is a maze of retry hoops and loops.
>
> Reduce it to simple and understan
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 11:44 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Subject: futex: Simplify futex_lock_pi_atomic() and make it more robust
> From: Thomas Gleixner
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:45:41 -
>
> futex_lock_pi_atomic() is a maze of retry hoops and loops.
>
> Reduce it to simple and understan
3 matches
Mail list logo
