On 02/24/2015 01:48 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 13:41 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 02/24/2015 01:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 02/24/2015 01:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That may cause the sa
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 13:41 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 01:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 02/24/2015 01:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>> That may cause the same line to be flushed twice. I would suggest,
On 02/24/2015 01:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 01:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> That may cause the same line to be flushed twice. I would suggest,
>>> instead, also removing the arithmetic on void *:
>>
>> Btw, s
On 02/24/2015 01:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> That may cause the same line to be flushed twice. I would suggest,
>> instead, also removing the arithmetic on void *:
>
> Btw, should we hold down all those suggested usages somewh
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That may cause the same line to be flushed twice. I would suggest,
> instead, also removing the arithmetic on void *:
Btw, should we hold down all those suggested usages somewhere in
Documentation/x86/ as commit messages are genera
On 02/20/2015 02:31 AM, tip-bot for Ross Zwisler wrote:
>
> This function shows how to properly use clwb/clflushopt/clflush
> and pcommit with appropriate fencing:
>
> void flush_and_commit_buffer(void *vaddr, unsigned int size)
> {
> void *vend = vaddr + size - 1;
>
> for (; vaddr <
6 matches
Mail list logo
