On Monday, 14 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:40:58 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Yep, but please fix the whitespace.
> > > >
> > > > Pavel
> > >
> >
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:40:58 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yep, but please fix the whitespace.
> > > Pavel
> >
> > OK, attached.
>
> Is anyone taking care of this patch or should I do that?
Linu
On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, David Smith wrote:
> > On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote:
> > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote:
> > > > > Dear list,
> > > > >
> > > > > this patch fixes a bug, tha
> On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote:
> > On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote:
> > > > Dear list,
> > > >
> > > > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume
> > > > correctly from a susp
On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote:
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly
> > > from a
> > > suspend
Kent is right, the solution from David is way better. I wanted to be consistent
with the other functions in tpm.c, but it definitely makes more sense in Davids
way. So please consider my patch as reverted and his patch as
Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
Marcel
Kent Yod
On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from
> > a
> > suspended state.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTE
7 matches
Mail list logo