On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:57:58AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I can't conveniently build it, so I'm sure I've broken things. I
>
> Indeed, you have :)
>
> > pushed the current work-in-progress branch to pci/host-rockchip-wip.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:57:58AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I can't conveniently build it, so I'm sure I've broken things. I
>
> Indeed, you have :)
>
> > pushed the current work-in-progress branch to pci/host-rockchip-wip.
Am Freitag, 2. September 2016, 10:44:09 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > The use of HIWORD_UPDATE can indeed be a bit confusing, IMO, but this is
> > > really a common
Am Freitag, 2. September 2016, 10:44:09 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > The use of HIWORD_UPDATE can indeed be a bit confusing, IMO, but this is
> > > really a common
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > The use of HIWORD_UPDATE can indeed be a bit confusing, IMO, but this is
> > really a common Rockchip-ism that, once you read several of their
> > drivers, can make a
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > The use of HIWORD_UPDATE can indeed be a bit confusing, IMO, but this is
> > really a common Rockchip-ism that, once you read several of their
> > drivers, can make a
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I can't conveniently build it, so I'm sure I've broken things. I
Indeed, you have :)
> pushed the current work-in-progress branch to pci/host-rockchip-wip.
> After we fix build errors and other thinkos, I'll rename it and put it
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I can't conveniently build it, so I'm sure I've broken things. I
Indeed, you have :)
> pushed the current work-in-progress branch to pci/host-rockchip-wip.
> After we fix build errors and other thinkos, I'll rename it and put it
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> > suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> > top of those.
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> > suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> > top of those.
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> top of those.
I'm not sure, but was this change your idea Bjorn?
commit
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> top of those.
I'm not sure, but was this change your idea Bjorn?
commit
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2016, 10:14:01 schrieb Brian Norris:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> > suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> > top of those.
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2016, 10:14:01 schrieb Brian Norris:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> > suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> > top of those.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:57:58AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I can't conveniently build it, so I'm sure I've broken things. I
>
> Indeed, you have :)
>
> > pushed the current work-in-progress branch to pci/host-rockchip-wip.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:57:58AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I can't conveniently build it, so I'm sure I've broken things. I
>
> Indeed, you have :)
>
> > pushed the current work-in-progress branch to pci/host-rockchip-wip.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:39:41AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Thanks for your review, and I think it still not too late
> for nitpicking as it isn't merged to next branch. :)
>
> We have amend the code a bit, so probably we fixed some of
> the minor issues against V10. But some of
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:39:41AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Thanks for your review, and I think it still not too late
> for nitpicking as it isn't merged to next branch. :)
>
> We have amend the code a bit, so probably we fixed some of
> the minor issues against V10. But some of
On 08/31/2016 08:39 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for your review, and I think it still not too late
for nitpicking as it isn't merged to next branch. :)
We have amend the code a bit, so probably we fixed some of
the minor issues against V10. But some of them are really
personal
On 08/31/2016 08:39 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for your review, and I think it still not too late
for nitpicking as it isn't merged to next branch. :)
We have amend the code a bit, so probably we fixed some of
the minor issues against V10. But some of them are really
personal
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for your review, and I think it still not too late
for nitpicking as it isn't merged to next branch. :)
We have amend the code a bit, so probably we fixed some of
the minor issues against V10. But some of them are really
personal taste, if you still insist on that, I will be
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for your review, and I think it still not too late
for nitpicking as it isn't merged to next branch. :)
We have amend the code a bit, so probably we fixed some of
the minor issues against V10. But some of them are really
personal taste, if you still insist on that, I will be
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:34:58AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> This patch adds Rockchip PCIe controller support found
> on RK3399 Soc platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris
> ---
>
> Changes in v10:
> - remove
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:34:58AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> This patch adds Rockchip PCIe controller support found
> on RK3399 Soc platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris
> ---
>
> Changes in v10:
> - remove ARM64 dependencies from Kconfig
>
> Changes in v9:
> -
24 matches
Mail list logo