On 15 Apr 2021, at 2:45, Huang, Ying wrote:
> "Zi Yan" writes:
>
>> On 13 Apr 2021, at 23:00, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>
>>> Yang Shi writes:
>>>
The generic migration path will check refcount, so no need check refcount
here.
But the old code actually prevents from migrating shared TH
"Zi Yan" writes:
> On 13 Apr 2021, at 23:00, Huang, Ying wrote:
>
>> Yang Shi writes:
>>
>>> The generic migration path will check refcount, so no need check refcount
>>> here.
>>> But the old code actually prevents from migrating shared THP (mapped by
>>> multiple
>>> processes), so bail out
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:00 PM Huang, Ying wrote:
>
> Yang Shi writes:
>
> > The generic migration path will check refcount, so no need check refcount
> > here.
> > But the old code actually prevents from migrating shared THP (mapped by
> > multiple
> > processes), so bail out early if mapcoun
On 13 Apr 2021, at 23:00, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Yang Shi writes:
>
>> The generic migration path will check refcount, so no need check refcount
>> here.
>> But the old code actually prevents from migrating shared THP (mapped by
>> multiple
>> processes), so bail out early if mapcount is > 1 to k
Yang Shi writes:
> The generic migration path will check refcount, so no need check refcount
> here.
> But the old code actually prevents from migrating shared THP (mapped by
> multiple
> processes), so bail out early if mapcount is > 1 to keep the behavior.
What prevents us from migrating sha
5 matches
Mail list logo