Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 04:01:23 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 01/16/2013 03:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:43:15 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: > >>> On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/16/2013 03:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:43:15 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: > Hi, >

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 01/16/2013 03:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:43:15 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: Hi, since friday's -next (the last known to be working is

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:43:15 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) > >> I cannot resume from suspend

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 01/16/2013 11:43 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see w

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Hi, >> >> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with >> no_console_suspend is: >> i915: No ACPI vi

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 01/16/2013 10:20 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might > give us some clues. > > Does it work without no_console_suspend? Hi, no, it does not work either way. But what I found out with debug enabled, that it's a completely different p

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-16 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see wit

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-14 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Hi, >> >> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with >> no_console_suspend is: >> i915: No ACPI vi

Re: -next: no resume from suspend

2013-01-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: > Hi, > > since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) > I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with > no_console_suspend is: > i915: No ACPI video bus found > > But I used to see the message always,