Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Alan Cox
> i'm guessing from your description that the missed event will be noticed > when the next socket arrives. i.e. if the server is pretty busy then the > missed events are not important. but if it's not a busy server, like a > hit every hour, then the missed event may be noticeable to browsers

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:25:32AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > > > apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... > > > > That's definitely a good thing. > >

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread dean gaudet
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > > apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... > > That's definitely a good thing. hmm, i'm not so sure -- 1.3.x is our stable release, and it sounds like this

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with > > -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. > > > > 00_wake-one-4 > > > >

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. 00_wake-one-4 Backport 2.4

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread dean gaudet
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... That's definitely a good thing. hmm, i'm not so sure -- 1.3.x is our stable release, and it sounds like this

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:25:32AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... That's definitely a good thing. hmm, i'm not

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Alan Cox
i'm guessing from your description that the missed event will be noticed when the next socket arrives. i.e. if the server is pretty busy then the missed events are not important. but if it's not a busy server, like a hit every hour, then the missed event may be noticeable to browsers (as a

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-15 Thread dean gaudet
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with > -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. > > 00_wake-one-4 > > Backport 2.4 waitqueues and in turn fixes an hanging condition in

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-15 Thread dean gaudet
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. 00_wake-one-4 Backport 2.4 waitqueues and in turn fixes an hanging condition in accept(2).