Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-03 Thread green
Hello! In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944. > > Bad, what else can I say? > We need desperately to know exactly what OS the xxx.xxx.1.14 machine > is running. Because you've commented out the first two octets,

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-03 Thread green
Hello! In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944. Bad, what else can I say? We need desperately to know exactly what OS the xxx.xxx.1.14 machine is running. Because you've commented out the first two octets, I

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread David
David S. Miller wrote: > We need desperately to know exactly what OS the xxx.xxx.1.14 machine > is running. Because you've commented out the first two octets, I > cannot check this myself using nmap. I see them all the time on my sites. I have active mirrors so they abound. Here are a few,

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread Jesse Wyant
Similar situation here: vanilla 2.4.2, with web serving/ftp/hotline/napster/etc., and I get this: TCP: peer 148.75.118.138:1360/6699 shrinks window 3200785160:0:3200795086. Bad, what else can I say? TCP: peer 148.75.118.138:1359/6699 shrinks window 3054879436:0:3054885108. Bad, what else can

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread Phil Brutsche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > > Jim Woodward writes: > > This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and > > wondered what it meant? > > > > TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread David S. Miller
Jim Woodward writes: > This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and > wondered what it meant? > > TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944. > Bad, what else can I say? > > Is it potentially bad? - Ive only ever seen it twice with

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread David S. Miller
Jim Woodward writes: This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and wondered what it meant? TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944. Bad, what else can I say? Is it potentially bad? - Ive only ever seen it twice with 2.4.x

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread Phil Brutsche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... Jim Woodward writes: This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and wondered what it meant? TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread Jesse Wyant
Similar situation here: vanilla 2.4.2, with web serving/ftp/hotline/napster/etc., and I get this: TCP: peer 148.75.118.138:1360/6699 shrinks window 3200785160:0:3200795086. Bad, what else can I say? TCP: peer 148.75.118.138:1359/6699 shrinks window 3054879436:0:3054885108. Bad, what else can

Re: 2.4.2 TCP window shrinking

2001-03-02 Thread David
David S. Miller wrote: We need desperately to know exactly what OS the xxx.xxx.1.14 machine is running. Because you've commented out the first two octets, I cannot check this myself using nmap. I see them all the time on my sites. I have active mirrors so they abound. Here are a few,