Andrew Morton wrote:
Miguelanxo Otero Salgueiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just compiled 2.6.11 from a 2.6.10 configuration for a desktop machine
(with kernel preemption activated).
Doing a make oldconfig bring some new options. I selected the default
value (for my system) for them, so I kee
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Also, I'd consider it a regression that you had to go and find new X
drivers due to a kernel change. We shouldn't do that.
depends really on how bad the bug in the X driver was
there is limits on how bug-2-bug compatible we can and want to be...
Well, all I can
> Also, I'd consider it a regression that you had to go and find new X
> drivers due to a kernel change. We shouldn't do that.
depends really on how bad the bug in the X driver was
there is limits on how bug-2-bug compatible we can and want to be...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
Miguelanxo Otero Salgueiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >You appear to have about five bugs here. Do any of them remain in
> >2.6.12-rc1?
> >
> >
> Well, one thing outstands: the synaptic touchpad is now really
> comfortable to use. Almost everything works, including simple and double
>
Miguelanxo Otero Salgueiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just compiled 2.6.11 from a 2.6.10 configuration for a desktop machine
> (with kernel preemption activated).
> Doing a make oldconfig bring some new options. I selected the default
> value (for my system) for them, so I keep configuring
Hi!
> I just compiled 2.6.11 from a 2.6.10 configuration for a desktop
> machine (with kernel preemption activated).
> Doing a make oldconfig bring some new options. I selected the default
> value (for my system) for them, so I keep configuring "make great
> kernel lock preemtive" to true (comp
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > That's an ACPI problem, I assume?
> >
>
> Probably. There is something flaky in ACPI event (it happened sometime
> between 2.6.7 and 2.6.9, i tried to check all the patches, but
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> That's an ACPI problem, I assume?
>
Probably. There is something flaky in ACPI event (it happened sometime
between 2.6.7 and 2.6.9, i tried to check all the patches, but I had find
nothing.
Could someone please check http://bug
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:50:08PM +0100, Miguelanxo Otero Salgueiro wrote:
>- Setting randomly "last battery full charge" to a huge value
> (example: 400 Ah when max battery capacity is 38 Ah) so I get random
> charging/discharging timing patterns
Happens to me sometime (and misdetection o
Miguelanxo Otero Salgueiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just compiled 2.6.11 from a 2.6.10 configuration for a desktop machine
> (with kernel preemption activated).
> Doing a make oldconfig bring some new options. I selected the default
> value (for my system) for them, so I keep configuri
10 matches
Mail list logo
