Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm dead on a Dell PE400SC without reverting this.
>
> On 7/6/05, Tero Roponen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > my computer (a ThinkPad 380XD laptop) hangs at boot in 2.6.13-rc2.
> > When I revert the patch below everything seems to be fine.
> >
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:00:37PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > It seems that everything is fine until some module
> > loads and does something.
>
> What does your /proc/ioports say under 2.6.12 with all modules
> loaded?
>
> Ivan.
cat /proc/ioports
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:00:37PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> It seems that everything is fine until some module
> loads and does something.
What does your /proc/ioports say under 2.6.12 with all modules
loaded?
Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:54:00PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Same here: 2.6.13-rc2 vanilla and 2.6.13-rc2 + patch #2 above both hang,
> > but 2.6.13-rc2 + patch #1 boots fine.
>
> I suspect that those larger (4K) cardbus IO windows are clashi
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:54:00PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Same here: 2.6.13-rc2 vanilla and 2.6.13-rc2 + patch #2 above both hang,
> but 2.6.13-rc2 + patch #1 boots fine.
I suspect that those larger (4K) cardbus IO windows are clashing with
some legacy IO ports. If so, this could be avo
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:38:28 +0300 (EEST), Tero Roponen wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:57:56AM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
>> > Thanks! Vanilla 2.6.13-rc2 with below patch applied
>> > works perfectly!
>>
>> Thanks for testing. Though, bad news are
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:38:28PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > #define CARDBUS_IO_SIZE (256)
> > #define CARDBUS_MEM_SIZE(32*1024*1024)
>
> This works correctly.
Thanks a lot. I'll go read the cardbus spec.
Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:57:56AM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > Thanks! Vanilla 2.6.13-rc2 with below patch applied
> > works perfectly!
>
> Thanks for testing. Though, bad news are that it's still unclear
> why your machine doesn't like large cardbus
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:57:56AM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> Thanks! Vanilla 2.6.13-rc2 with below patch applied
> works perfectly!
Thanks for testing. Though, bad news are that it's still unclear
why your machine doesn't like large cardbus windows and therefore
how to fix that correctly.
May
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
Thanks! Vanilla 2.6.13-rc2 with below patch applied
works perfectly!
-
Tero Roponen
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:13:49PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > I applied your original patch (the no-op one) and the
> > end=0 patch. With those applied I could bo
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:13:49PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> I applied your original patch (the no-op one) and the
> end=0 patch. With those applied I could boot into login
> prompt.
Puzzling. None of these patches should affect your setup.
And you still have DMA timeouts...
> Attached are lsp
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:47:58PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > I just tested the patch, but it didn't help. It still hangs.
>
> Well, the code in setup-bus.c does actually know about host
> bridges, so the patch was just no-op...
>
> Tero (and others
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:47:58PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > I just tested the patch, but it didn't help. It still hangs.
>
> Well, the code in setup-bus.c does actually know about host
> bridges, so the patch was just no-op...
>
> Tero (and others
Initialized end = 0 fixed me.
On 7/7/05, Ivan Kokshaysky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:27:11PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > I'm dead on a Dell PE400SC without reverting this.
>
> Jon, can you try this one instead:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/6/273
>
> If it doesn't hel
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:47:58PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> I just tested the patch, but it didn't help. It still hangs.
Well, the code in setup-bus.c does actually know about host
bridges, so the patch was just no-op...
Tero (and others), can you post dmesg from working kernel and,
if possib
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:47:28 +0300 (EEST), Tero Roponen wrote:
>my computer (a ThinkPad 380XD laptop) hangs at boot in 2.6.13-rc2.
>When I revert the patch below everything seems to be fine.
Same here: my Targa Visionary 811 Athlon64 laptop
hangs during boot with 2.6.13-rc2, unless I revert
the pat
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:33:46PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> > 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge
> > (AGP disabled) (rev 02)
> > Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> > Step
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:33:46PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (AGP
> disabled) (rev 02)
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:27:11PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > I'm dead on a Dell PE400SC without reverting this.
>
> Jon, can you try this one instead:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/6/273
>
> If it doesn't help, I'd like to see 'lspci -vv' from your ma
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:27:11PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I'm dead on a Dell PE400SC without reverting this.
Jon, can you try this one instead:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/6/273
If it doesn't help, I'd like to see 'lspci -vv' from your machine.
Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
I'm dead on a Dell PE400SC without reverting this.
On 7/6/05, Tero Roponen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my computer (a ThinkPad 380XD laptop) hangs at boot in 2.6.13-rc2.
> When I revert the patch below everything seems to be fine.
>
> thanks,
> Tero Roponen
>
>
> Patch to revert:
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
