Please take a look at 7466, they seem to fight same problem, so may be
removing same patch will work...
And Linus is about to drop it anyway...
Regards,
Alex.
David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 10:22 pm, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey St
On Thursday 16 November 2006 10:22 pm, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> > @@ -467,8 +467,8 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *dat
> > status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_E
On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -467,8 +467,8 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *dat
> status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER,
> acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
> }
> acpi_
On Thursday 16 November 2006 8:23 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like either EC GPE or whole ACPI irq got disabled... Could you
> >> check that ACPI interrupts still arrive after
> >> you
David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Looks like either EC GPE or whole ACPI irq got disabled... Could you
check that ACPI interrupts still arrive after
you notice AE_TIME?
If I unplug AC, /proc/interrrupts reports 2 IRQs going to ACPI.
On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Looks like either EC GPE or whole ACPI irq got disabled... Could you
> check that ACPI interrupts still arrive after
> you notice AE_TIME?
If I unplug AC, /proc/interrrupts reports 2 IRQs going to ACPI.
Then on replug, it reports
Looks like either EC GPE or whole ACPI irq got disabled... Could you
check that ACPI interrupts still arrive after
you notice AE_TIME?
Also, may be attached patch will help?
Regards,
Alex.
David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 1:56 pm, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 15
7 matches
Mail list logo
