31 Ara 2006 Paz 02:47 tarihinde, Adrian Bunk şunları yazmıştı:
[...]
> Subject: ALSA: No sound in KDE with intel hda
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/30/73
> Submitter : Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status : unknown
Just tried with 2.6.18.6 and aRts still have no sound,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 10:21:36PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Subject: BUG at fs/buffer.c:1235 when using gdb
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/17/134
> > Submitter : Andrew J. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Fixed-By
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Subject: BUG at fs/buffer.c:1235 when using gdb
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/17/134
> Submitter : Andrew J. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fixed-By : Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Commit : 8701ea957dd2a7c309e17c8dcde
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:14:13PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
>
> > There's also http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/21/47; the included patch break
> > my nVidia devices and probably all PCIX devices, so it's not right, but
> > something has to be done to
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:07:10PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 23:39 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
> >
> > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> > of the bugs, mainta
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:14:13PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> There's also http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/21/47; the included patch break
> my nVidia devices and probably all PCIX devices, so it's not right, but
> something has to be done to fix ATI. My guess is a quirk to say that
> pci_int
There's also http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/21/47; the included patch break
my nVidia devices and probably all PCIX devices, so it's not right, but
something has to be done to fix ATI. My guess is a quirk to say that
pci_intx doesn't work on certain devices and should just be skipped, but
I'm not
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 23:39 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a b
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:51:06PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:02 -0300
>
> > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
> >
> > Add that on S
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 10:36:02PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
>
> Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and
> 2.6.19.1 work fine, before 2.
From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:02 -0300
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
>
> Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and
> 2.6.19.1 wo
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and
2.6.19.1 work fine, before 2.6.20-rc1 it broke. I checked the initrds for
both versions, the only differenc
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 03:17:53PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > In Linus' tree, it currently only depends on EXPERIMENTAL.
> >
> > It seems commit 009af1ff78bfc30b9a27807dd0207fc32848218a wasn't intended
> > for Linus?
>
> I think we shoul
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> In Linus' tree, it currently only depends on EXPERIMENTAL.
>
> It seems commit 009af1ff78bfc30b9a27807dd0207fc32848218a wasn't intended
> for Linus?
I think we should just remove it.
It's broken.
Nobody cares.
If people want to do concurrent stuf
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:39:09PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > Subject: PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE breakage
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/12/21
> > Submitter : Ben Castricum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Caused-By : Greg K
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:39:09PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Subject: PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE breakage
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/12/21
> Submitter : Ben Castricum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> commit 009af1ff78bfc3
16 matches
Mail list logo
