Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-26 Thread Andrew Clayton
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:47:25 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Subject: NFS triggers WARN_ON() in invalidate_inode_pages2_range() > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7826 > Submitter : Andrew Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-25 Thread Gerhard Dirschl
Am Mittwoch 24 Januar 2007 21:45 schrieb Peter Osterlund: > > Subject: pktcdvd fails with pata_amd > > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 > > Submitter : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Status : unknown > Does reverting this patch help? > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Peter Osterlund
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Subject: pktcdvd fails with pata_amd > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 > Submitter : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Status : unknown Does reverting this patch help? http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:57:09AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Was the removed > > setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3); > > without any effects? > > I didn't think that was ever checked in. I thought the patch was still > being discusse

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Was the removed > setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3); > without any effects? I didn't think that was ever checked in. I thought the patch was still being discussed. The line missing will not as far as I can see cause any problems, it will le

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:06:31AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:47:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Subject: fix geode_configure() > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/216 > > Submitter : Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Caused-By : takada <[

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:47:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: fix geode_configure() > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/216 > Submitter : Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : takada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > commit e4f0ae0ea63caceff37a13f281a72652b7ea

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-18 Thread Sami Farin
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 14:43:29 +1100, David Chinner wrote: ... > > > Subject: BUG: at mm/truncate.c:60 cancel_dirty_page() (XFS) > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/5/308 > > > Submitter : Sami Farin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Handled-By : David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > S

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-16 Thread David Chinner
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:15:02PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:27:48PM -0500, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >... > > > A lot of developers (including me) will be gone next week for > > > Linux.Conf.Au, so you

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-15 Thread David Chinner
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:27:48PM -0500, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >... > > A lot of developers (including me) will be gone next week for > > Linux.Conf.Au, so you have a week of rest and quiet to test this, and > > report any problems

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-14 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Damien Wyart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Subject: BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/... > > cdrom_{open,release,ioctl} in trace > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/26/105 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/22 > > http://lkml.o

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-13 Thread Aaron Sethman
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote: * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070113 08:11]: This still leaves the old regressions we have not yet fixed... This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19. S

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-13 Thread Jon Smirl
On 1/13/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote: > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070113 08:11]: > > This still leaves the old regressions we have not yet fixed... > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compare

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Damien Wyart wrote: > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070113 08:11]: > > This still leaves the old regressions we have not yet fixed... > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19. > > > Subject: BUG: scheduling whil

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions

2007-01-13 Thread Damien Wyart
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070113 08:11]: > This still leaves the old regressions we have not yet fixed... > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19. > Subject: BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/... > cdrom_{open,release,ioctl}