Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I
can provide an updated version when a new 2.6.20 kernel is released?
they should be generated the way you did: apply the 2.6.20 baseline -rt
kernel patch to the later patches and fix up rejec
* John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sure, i can put it there.
>
> Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I
> can provide an updated version when a new 2.6.20 kernel is released?
they should be generated the way you did: apply the 2.6.20 baseline -rt
kernel patch
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
I'd be happy to generate a clean patch!
(Would you agree to host it in your directory?)
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/older/
sure, i can put it there.
Great! Can you tell me how you generate the original -rt patch, so I can
provide an updat
* John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be happy to generate a clean patch!
> (Would you agree to host it in your directory?)
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/older/
sure, i can put it there.
> 3. linux/kernel/futex.c
> [ I'm not sure I've made the appropriate changes here ]
>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
John wrote:
I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
The unified diff is attached to this message.
thanks - this is useful to those who are not that much on the bleeding
edge.
I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
78 hunks had to be
* John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tweaked patch-2.6.20-rt8 so that it applies to 2.6.20.5
>
> The unified diff is attached to this message.
thanks - this is useful to those who are not that much on the bleeding
edge.
> I'd be happy to hear comments on what I've done wrong.
6 matches
Mail list logo
