On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:34:57 PST, Michael Chan said:
> Ideally, the BIOS should modify the NVRAM's setting when it is changed.
> We will talk to Dell to get their opinion on this as this is very
> confusing to the user.
That would certainly explain what I'm seeing, and I can certainly wait
if the
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 01:35 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Issue:
>
> I (for unrelated reasons) run powertop, and it suggests I conserve power
> by doing 'ethtool -s eth0 wol d'. I look at it, and think that it's daft,
> because (a) the Dell factory default is WOL disabled and (b) if it wa
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:04:28 PST, Michael Chan said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > (a) the Dell factory default is WOL disabled and (b)
> > if it wasn't
> > the default, I'd have *set* it to disabled, and (c) I even
> > went back and
> > rebooted and checked the BIOS setting - disabled. Nonethe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (a) the Dell factory default is WOL disabled and (b)
> if it wasn't
> the default, I'd have *set* it to disabled, and (c) I even
> went back and
> rebooted and checked the BIOS setting - disabled. Nonetheless:
>
> # ethtool eth0 | grep Wake
> Supports Wake-on:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:24:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said:
>
> > wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration.
> >
> > I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix
> > C-state issue identified.
>
> Conf
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said:
> wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration.
>
> I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix
> C-state issue identified.
Confirming that patch left my CPUs mostly in C3 again. Thanks.
I'll have to let Mark a
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
>
> Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
>
> As reported by 'powe
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:03:52 -0800 Mark Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > > call.
> > >
> > > I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and
> > > then
> > > stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same
> > > behavior
> > > I was ge
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:02:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> > much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
> >
> > Dell Latitude D820 l
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
>
> Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
>
> As reported by 'powe
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
>
> Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
>
> As reported by 'powertop'
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 05:19:24PM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> /me wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel/linux-2.6.23-mm1-work> make
> > include/config/kernel.release
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel/linux-2.6.23-mm1-work> cat
> > include/config/kernel.release
> > 2.6.23-mm1-testing
> > [EMAI
/me wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel/linux-2.6.23-mm1-work> make
> include/config/kernel.release
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel/linux-2.6.23-mm1-work> cat
> include/config/kernel.release
> 2.6.23-mm1-testing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel/linux-2.6.23-mm1-work> make
> [...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:12:38 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After the bisecting, i found that the patch git-net.patch is the cause for
> the link failure.
The actual cause is my patch to mark some things in head_64.S as
init_refok. I have a test patch which I will tidy up
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 10:56 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I just tried it. In the latest git tree, autofs still works.
>
> The regression is in -mm only.
Andrew,
Rik tracked it down to an interaction with futexes from the pid
namespace code. I believe r/o bind mounts are innocent for now.
-- D
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:45:19 +0800
Ian Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oct 20 00:38:52 kenny automount[2293]: cache_readlock: mapent cache
> > rwlock lock failed
>
> This is quite strange, normally it should never fail and, in all the
> time version 5 has been available the maximum number of
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 01:13 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:26 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> >
> > - I've been largely avoiding applying anything since rc8-mm2 i
On Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:58, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> >
> > Ok, now that it boots let's go for more.
> >
> > I cannot suspend
Hi!
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
>
> Ok, now that it boots let's go for more.
>
> I cannot suspend if mysqld is running. mysql isn't atually doing
> anything useful anywa
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:48:48 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the
>>> lpar,
>>> which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkm
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 02:58:17PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
>
> Ok, now that it boots let's go for more.
>
> I cannot suspend if mysqld is
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
Ok, now that it boots let's go for more.
I cannot suspend if mysqld is running. mysql isn't atually doing
anything useful anyway.
This is the failed
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 07:18:26AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 22:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:57:54 +0900 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:54:45 -0400
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:54:04 -0400
> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:39:00 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:13:10 -0400 Rik van Rie
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
Hey there!!
fails to boot here with this friendly oops:
http://oioio.altervista.org/linux/dsc01702.jpg
.config: http://oioio.altervista.org/linux/co
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 22:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:57:54 +0900 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:54:04 -0400
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:39:00 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:13:10 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:26 -0700
> > > Andre
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:39:00 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:13:10 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:26 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:13:10 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:26 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> >
> > - I've been largely avoiding applying any
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:57:54 +0900 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
>
> Hey there!!
> fails to boot here with this friendly oops:
> h
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:26 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
>
> - I've been largely avoiding applying anything since rc8-mm2 in an
> attempt to stabilise things for the 2.6.23 merge.
Between rc8
On 10/17/07, Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello !
>
> While polling the contents of a cgroup task file, I caught the
> following corruption. Is there a known race (and a fix) or should
> I start digging ?
>
> list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (80a3f338), but w
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > hm, I guess this is probably due to pie-randomization patch, right?
> > (could you please try reverting it, to see whether things get back to
> > normal).
> Maybe this can be fix.
Andrew,
below is a fixed version with patch from Kamezawa Hiroyu
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:17 +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> > please cc netdev on network issues.
>
> yes.
>
> >> Bringing up interface eth0: Ý cut here ¨
> >> Kernel BUG at 0002 Ýverbose debug info unavailable¨
> >> illegal operation: 0001 Ý#1¨
> >
> >
>> that helped going a little further in the boot process but we then have
>> a network issue when bringing the network interface up :
>
> please cc netdev on network issues.
yes.
>> Bringing up interface eth0: Ý cut here ¨
>> Kernel BUG at 0002 Ýverbose d
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 11:16 +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>> This is the vmlinux.lds.S problem. The cleanup patch from Sam Ravnborg
>>> moved the __initramfs_start and __initramfs_end symbols into
>>> the .init.ramfs section. This is in itself not a problem, but it
>>>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:16:16 +0200 Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:31 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> Quoting Christian Borntraeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> Sig
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 11:16 +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> > This is the vmlinux.lds.S problem. The cleanup patch from Sam Ravnborg
> > moved the __initramfs_start and __initramfs_end symbols into
> > the .init.ramfs section. This is in itself not a problem, but it
> > surfaced a bug: there is n
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:31 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Christian Borntraeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>> Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
Sigh, well this turned out less informative than I'd liked.
After bisecting 2.6.23 to 2.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > yes, this looks correct to me. Did you verify that it makes the
> > problem you are seeing go away?
> yes. I confirmed this works well.
Thanks a lot, it works flawlessly. I will rebase the patch after
2.6.24-rc1 is released and will send it to A
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 15:31 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Christian Borntraeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> > > Sigh, well this turned out less informative than I'd liked.
> > > After bisecting 2.6.23 to 2.6.23-mm1, I found that
> >
Quoting Christian Borntraeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> > Sigh, well this turned out less informative than I'd liked.
> > After bisecting 2.6.23 to 2.6.23-mm1, I found that
> > git-s390.patch is the one breaking my s390 boot :(
> > (Frown bc i
Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> Sigh, well this turned out less informative than I'd liked.
> After bisecting 2.6.23 to 2.6.23-mm1, I found that
> git-s390.patch is the one breaking my s390 boot :(
> (Frown bc it's a conglomeration of patches0
>
> Symptom is:
> "Ca
On 10/17/07, Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello !
>
> While polling the contents of a cgroup task file, I caught the
> following corruption. Is there a known race (and a fix) or should
> I start digging ?
Not a known race, no. Sorry, didn't have time to look at this
yesterday sinc
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal writes:
>
>> The kernel build fails on the power box
>>
>> INSTALL vdso64.so
>>
>> INSTALL vdso32.so
>>
>> BOOTCC arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.o
>>
>> arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.c:920:19: error: errno.h: No such file or directory
>
> This problem is fix
Kamalesh Babulal writes:
> The kernel build fails on the power box
>
> INSTALL vdso64.so
>
> INSTALL vdso32.so
>
> BOOTCC arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.o
>
> arch/powerpc/boot/inflate.c:920:19: error: errno.h: No such file or directory
This problem is fixed by d4faaecbcc6d9ea4f7c05f6de6af9
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:07:54AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> The correct fix is to make advansys depend on CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS, or
> alternatively fix advansys.c properly by making it use the interfaces
> described in Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt (or the equivalent scsi
> helpers).
If you loo
Andrew Morton writes:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:14:22 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The functions virt_to_bus and bus_to_virt are begin defined between ifdef
> > CONFIG_PPC32
> > but when i compile allyesconfig with ppc64 box,i get this error. This patch
> > removes the
>
Am 14.10.2007 00:11 schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
> CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-testing"
[...]
> has worked fine for all of 2.6.23{-rc?{,-mm?},}. For 2.6.23-mm1
> [there is] "make modules_install" installing the
> modules into /lib/modules/2.6.23-mm1 instead of
> /lib/modules/2.6.23-mm1-testing, and "make inst
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:11:52AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Something seems to be amiss with CONFIG_LOCALVERSION handling.
>
> I am routinely building with
> CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-testing"
> CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y
> My usual sequence of "make ; sudo make modules_install install"
> has wo
pcm:snd_pcm_playback_ioctl+0x2e/0x36
> [] do_ioctl+0x2a/0x77
> [] vfs_ioctl+0x251/0x26e
> [] sys_ioctl+0x57/0x7b
> [] system_call+0x7e/0x83
>
> Full dmesg attached.
>
ubject: [PATCH] static initialization and blocking notification for pm_qos...
was Re: 2.6.23-mm1
please
Hello !
While polling the contents of a cgroup task file, I caught the
following corruption. Is there a known race (and a fix) or should
I start digging ?
the program running in the cgroup is fork/exec intensive:
while (1) {
int i, s;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:31:03PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> Here's a patch I worked up the other night that kills off struct file
>> completely from the xattr code. I've tested it locally.
>
> Looks like a merge of Dave
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:42:04 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > > Oh well, this causes more trouble that I have ever imagined ... I will
> > > look into it, thanks a lot for the report. Andrew, please drop this
> > > one aga
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > Oh well, this causes more trouble that I have ever imagined ... I will
> > look into it, thanks a lot for the report. Andrew, please drop this
> > one again, I will fix it up.
> Maybe this can be fix.
Hi Kame,
yes, this looks correct to me. Did
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:10:23 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hm, I guess this is probably due to pie-randomization patch, right? (could
> you please try reverting it, to see whether things get back to normal).
>
> Oh well, this causes more trouble that I have ever i
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> I noticed 32bit binary on x86_64 behavior is changed on 2.6.23-mm1.
> This is a result of pmap after process returns -ENOMEM.(see attached program)
> == on 2.6.23 ==
[...]
> total 4193272K
> ==
> == on 2.6.23-mm1==
[...]
> total 2
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:01:01 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed 32bit binary on x86_64 behavior is changed on 2.6.23-mm1.
>
> This is a result of pmap after process returns -ENOMEM.(see attached program)
> == on 2.6.23 ==
> errno 12
> 3531: ./malloc
> 100
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:06:04PM +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> > Here's a patch I worked up the other night that kills off struct file
> > completely from the xattr code. I've tested it locally.
>
> Sorry Jeff, your patch does not apply on 2.6.23-mm1. The 'struct file'
> removal from reiserfs_
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:31:03PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> Here's a patch I worked up the other night that kills off struct file
> completely from the xattr code. I've tested it locally.
Looks like a merge of Dave's and my patch :)
ACK from me, I don't care whether it's one or two patches.
-
I noticed 32bit binary on x86_64 behavior is changed on 2.6.23-mm1.
This is a result of pmap after process returns -ENOMEM.(see attached program)
== on 2.6.23 ==
errno 12
3531: ./malloc
1000 6272K -[ anon ]
00621000100K r-x-- /lib/ld-2.5.so
0063a000
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:28:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:58, Mark Gross wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:32:40PM +0200
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:58, Mark Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:32:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Friday, 12 October 2007 06:31, Andrew
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:32:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 12 October 2007 06:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linu
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:55:06PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:47, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:13:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes. Corrected patch fol
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:48:48 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the lpar,
>> which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/2) is still
>> seen in 2.6.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:48:48 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the lpar,
> which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/2) is still
> seen in 2.6.23-mm1, the link failure is
>
Hi Andrew,
The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the lpar,
which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/2) is still
seen in 2.6.23-mm1, the link failure is
ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o(.text+0x80c8): sibling call optimization to
`.text.init
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:47, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:13:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Corrected patch follows.
> >
> > A bit more is needed due to the rename of lite5200_pm_init()
On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:32:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 12 October 2007 06:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> > >
> > > - I've been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 15.10.2007 20:31, Jeff Mahoney a écrit :
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
reiserfs_delete_xattrs
reiserfs_delete_inode
generic_delete_inode
Le 15.10.2007 20:31, Jeff Mahoney a écrit :
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>>> reiserfs_delete_xattrs
>>> reiserfs_delete_inode
>>> generic_delete_inode
>>> generic_drop_inode
>>> iput
>>> do_unlinkat
>>> sys_unlink
>>> sys_enter_past_
Le 15.10.2007 10:40, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> reiserfs_delete_xattrs
>> reiserfs_delete_inode
>> generic_delete_inode
>> generic_drop_inode
>> iput
>> do_unlinkat
>> sys_unlink
>> sys_enter_past_esp
>>
>> I reported a similar
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> reiserfs_delete_xattrs
>> reiserfs_delete_inode
>> generic_delete_inode
>> generic_drop_inode
>> iput
>> do_unlinkat
>> sys_unlink
>> sys_enter_past_esp
>>
>> I reported a similar BUG in 2.6.22-rc8-mm2 (s
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 11:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I only have a WARNING in my dmesg but i don't think this is related to this
> > :
> >
> > Oct 13 01:44:52 lara [10722.146448] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:586
> > __mntput()
> > Oct 13 01:44:52 lara [10722.146478] [] mntput_no_expire+0x5
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 14:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:38:25 +0200
> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Le 12.10.2007 06:31, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> >
> > Mounting reis
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> reiserfs_delete_xattrs
> reiserfs_delete_inode
> generic_delete_inode
> generic_drop_inode
> iput
> do_unlinkat
> sys_unlink
> sys_enter_past_esp
>
> I reported a similar BUG in 2.6.22-rc8-mm2 (see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/27/
On Mon, Oct 15 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15 2007, Milan Broz wrote:
> > >
> > > clone->bi_size is zero here now, so crypt_free_buffer_pages will not
> > > work correctly (previously there was count of processed bytes).
> > >
> > > But
On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15 2007, Milan Broz wrote:
> >
> > clone->bi_size is zero here now, so crypt_free_buffer_pages will not
> > work correctly (previously there was count of processed bytes).
> >
> > But because it seems that bio cannot be processed partia
On Mon, Oct 15 2007, Milan Broz wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:12:08 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> ...
> >> 354036 Page allocated via order 0, mask 0x11202
> >> 1 (PFN/Block always differ) PFN 3072 Block 6 type 0
> >> Flags
Le 12.10.2007 06:31, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
/home is mounted with the following options:
/dev/mapper/vglinux1-lvhome on /home type reiserfs
(rw,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr)
I guess that beagled (the Beagle d
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:12:08 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> 354036 Page allocated via order 0, mask 0x11202
>> 1 (PFN/Block always differ) PFN 3072 Block 6 type 0
>> Flags
>> 354338 [0x80266373] mempool_alloc+83
>> 35433
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:47, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:13:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Yes. Corrected patch follows.
>
> A bit more is needed due to the rename of lite5200_pm_init() to
> lite5200_suspend_init().
Well, I didn't intend to change it. :-)
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:13:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Yes. Corrected patch follows.
A bit more is needed due to the rename of lite5200_pm_init() to
lite5200_suspend_init(). An amended patch follows that builds and
boots on my powermac.
---
diff -aurN linux-2.6.23-mm1.orig/arch
On 10/14/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:12:08 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first column is the times I found this line in page_owner.
>
> err, take another look at the changelog in
> page-owner-tracking-leak-detector.patch. It dir
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:12:08 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:54:26 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > The page-owner code can pinpoint a leak source. See
> > > > ft
On 10/14/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:54:26 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The page-owner code can pinpoint a leak source. See
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/broken-out/page-o
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:54:26 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The page-owner code can pinpoint a leak source. See
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/broken-out/page-owner-tracking-leak-detector.patch
> >
> > Enable CONFIG_DEBUG
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 06:26, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday, 13 October 2007 19:58, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just tried 2.6.23-mm1 and suspend is not working there. automount
> > > refuse
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 13 October 2007 19:58, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just tried 2.6.23-mm1 and suspend is not working there. automount
> > refuses to go in the freezer. I've attached dmesg (three attempts to
> > sus
* Oleg Nesterov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 10/12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:47:59 -0400
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > I noticed a regression between 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 and 2.6.23-mm1 (with your
> > > hotfixes). User sp
On Saturday, 13 October 2007 20:40, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 13 October 2007 17:50, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/li
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 October 2007 17:50, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:31:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> >
> >
> > D
Torsten Kaiser wrote:
On 10/13/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Torsten Kaiser wrote:
3 boots, all worked. So I'm very sure that was the bug, but I will now
do a little load testing...
The only strange thing about 2.6.23-mm1 is, that it takes ~4 second
more to boot.
So, you basicall
On 10/13/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:05:19 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The only thing I noted during load testing (updating Gentoo ==
> > compiling and installing) was, that there seems to be memory leak.
> > After ~2h 2.5 of my
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:05:19 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing I noted during load testing (updating Gentoo ==
> compiling and installing) was, that there seems to be memory leak.
> After ~2h 2.5 of my 4Gb where gone. But there where to many things
> going on to pi
Hi,
On Saturday, 13 October 2007 19:58, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried 2.6.23-mm1 and suspend is not working there. automount
> refuses to go in the freezer. I've attached dmesg (three attempts to
> suspend so it gets a bit big). Suspend works on 2.6.23 and sched-devel.
>
> Another f
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:12:49 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
>>>
>>> - I've been largely avoiding applying anything since rc8-mm2 in an atte
On 10/13/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > 3 boots, all worked. So I'm very sure that was the bug, but I will now
> > do a little load testing...
> >
> > The only strange thing about 2.6.23-mm1 is, that it takes ~4 second
> > more to boot.
>
> So, you basically
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:12:49 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> >
> > - I've been largely avoiding applying anything since rc8-mm2 in an attempt
> > to stabilise thi
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
