On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 6:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, now you're saying 2.6.23.12 is also affected, so this doesn't seem to
> > be a recent regression in fact?
> >
>
> I have run 2.6.23 series before but my usage pattern seem
On Jan 7, 2008 6:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, now you're saying 2.6.23.12 is also affected, so this doesn't seem to
> be a recent regression in fact?
>
I have run 2.6.23 series before but my usage pattern seems to have not
triggered the bug before.
But yes, this is
On Tuesday, 8 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 2:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, In
On Jan 6, 2008 2:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PR
On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:55:01 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23
> > >> report
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:55:01 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23
> >> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no
> >> fixes in t
On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Subject : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck fo
On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> > > Submitter : "Parag Warudkar" <[EMAIL
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:38:53 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
> > Submitter : Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007-11-29 08:36
> > References
On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Subject : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> > Submitter : "Parag Warudkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007-12-07 18:14
> > References : http:/
On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
> > Submitter : Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007-11-29 08:36
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkm
* Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
>> 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
>> of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
> ..
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> Submitter : "Parag Warudkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 2007-12-07 18:14
> References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/299
> http://bugzilla.
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
> Submitter : Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 2007-11-29 08:36
> References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/sh
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
..
Subject : 2+ wake-ups/second in 2.6.2
On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Subject : PATA_HPT37X embezzles two ports
> > Submitter : "Bjoern Olausson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007-12-12 11:05
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/12/161
> > http://bugzilla.kernel
> Subject : PATA_HPT37X embezzles two ports
> Submitter : "Bjoern Olausson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 2007-12-12 11:05
> References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/12/161
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
HPT374 patch was posted.
We
17 matches
Mail list logo