On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:34:17 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:47:08 + Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now, this was working in 2.6.23, but is not in any later kernel.
> > Previously reported, but I guess that the previous report was
> > igno
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:34:17 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:47:08 + Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now, this was working in 2.6.23, but is not in any later kernel.
> > Previously reported, but I guess that the previous report was
> > igno
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:47:08 + Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, this was working in 2.6.23, but is not in any later kernel. Previously
> reported, but I guess that the previous report was ignored due to the kernel
> being tainted.
Not really. A lot of acpi-related bug reports ge
3 matches
Mail list logo