On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 03:56:41PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Dan Mann wrote:
> > I was just wondering if anybody had an idea which nic card might be a better
> > choice for me; I have a pci 3c590 and a pci smc that uses the tulip driver.
> > I don't have
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 05:09:52PM +0900, root wrote:
> Basically, it appears that Don Becker praised the Tulip chipset the most.
> How much important is "zero copy TX and hardware checksumming"?
Zero copy TX is not that important yet except if you use samba or Tux or
proftpd or anything else t
Andi Kleen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
>
>On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Dan Mann wrote:
>> I was just wondering if anybody had an idea which nic card might be a better
>> choice for me; I have a pci 3c590 and a pci smc that uses the tulip driver.
>> I don't have the card number for t
TECTED]>
To: "Dan Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: 3c590 vs. tulip
>
> > faster machine it is much slower. Images take at least .5 to 1 second
to
> > load when they are stored locally. But over the ne
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Dan Mann wrote:
> The server has lots (ok, about 20,000 not counting the os itself) of medium
> sized files on it, ranging in size from 60k to 40MB. When I run gqview
> (image viewing program) on the client and point to a local directory that is
> mapped
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Dan Mann wrote:
> I was just wondering if anybody had an idea which nic card might be a better
> choice for me; I have a pci 3c590 and a pci smc that uses the tulip driver.
> I don't have the card number for the smc with me handy, however I know both
> car
6 matches
Mail list logo
