On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
> Very interesting. I had not heard about this. Are there any SMP boards
> with a VIA chipset that does work well with Linux and USB? I have an
> old P2B-DS that I had replace with this board as I needed more PCI
> slots. Heck, for
:: AFAIK, the option to compile w/o APIC is only for UP systems. If you
:: want to use both of your processors, you have to compile in APIC
:: support, but just disable it when loading the kernel (ie. for lilo,
:: 'append="noapic"')
I haven't seen the beginning of the APIC/VIA/Tyan thread, but i
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Greg,
>
> :: It seems that the APIC on this motherboard does not have most of the
> :: pins connected, so that even if we could get the USB interrupt to work
> :: properly (which we couldn't) there would be no benefit to run in APIC
> :: mode. I was
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:25:13AM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
> Well, I can't speak for the consequences of noapic (I've wondered as
> much myself), but I know that there's been a problem with SMP 2.4
> kernels (even the 2.4 test kernels) and USB running on VIA chipsets for
> a while now. I'm tol
Greg,
:: It seems that the APIC on this motherboard does not have most of the
:: pins connected, so that even if we could get the USB interrupt to work
:: properly (which we couldn't) there would be no benefit to run in APIC
:: mode. I was going to run some crude benchmarks on the box with and
:
Pete Toscano wrote:
>
> Very interesting. I had not heard about this. Are there any SMP boards
> with a VIA chipset that does work well with Linux and USB? I have an
> old P2B-DS that I had replace with this board as I needed more PCI
> slots. Heck, for that matter are there any SMP boards th
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
>
> Very interesting. I had not heard about this. Are there any SMP boards
> with a VIA chipset that does work well with Linux and USB? I have an
> old P2B-DS that I had replace with this board as I needed more PCI
> slots. Heck, f
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:25:13AM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
> > Well, I can't speak for the consequences of noapic (I've wondered as
> > much myself), but I know that there's been a problem with SMP 2.4
> > kernels (even the 2.4 test kernels) and USB runn
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:25:13AM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
> Well, I can't speak for the consequences of noapic (I've wondered as
> much myself), but I know that there's been a problem with SMP 2.4
> kernels (even the 2.4 test kernels) and USB running on VIA chipsets for
> a while now. I'm tol
Pete Toscano wrote:
>
> Well, I can't speak for the consequences of noapic (I've wondered as
> much myself), but I know that there's been a problem with SMP 2.4
> kernels (even the 2.4 test kernels) and USB running on VIA chipsets for
> a while now. I'm told by the linux-usb maintainers that it'
Well, I can't speak for the consequences of noapic (I've wondered as
much myself), but I know that there's been a problem with SMP 2.4
kernels (even the 2.4 test kernels) and USB running on VIA chipsets for
a while now. I'm told by the linux-usb maintainers that it's a problem
with the PCI IRQ ro
11 matches
Mail list logo
