Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
So if you have reported a regression in the 2.6.21-rc
series, please check 2.6.21-rc5, and update your
report as appropriate (whether fixed or "still
problems with xyzzy").
>>> [just got back from vacation, or would have sent this
>>> earlier]
>>
Hi!
> >>So if you have reported a regression in the 2.6.21-rc
> >>series, please check 2.6.21-rc5, and update your
> >>report as appropriate (whether fixed or "still
> >>problems with xyzzy").
> >
> >[just got back from vacation, or would have sent this
> >earlier]
> >
> >FWIW, I'm still leani
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
FWIW, I'm still leaning towards disabling libata ACPI support by default for
2.6.21.
Hey, I'm not going to argue against anything that says "disable ACPI". Of
*course* it should be disabled if there aren't thousands of machines th
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> FWIW, I'm still leaning towards disabling libata ACPI support by default for
> 2.6.21.
Hey, I'm not going to argue against anything that says "disable ACPI". Of
*course* it should be disabled if there aren't thousands of machines that
are in user ha
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
There's various fixes here, ranging from some architecture updates
(ia64, ARM, MIPS, SH, Sparc64) to KVM, networking and network drivers.
And random one-liners.
But probably more important, and likely much more visible to most
people is the fixes for
5 matches
Mail list logo