Hi!
> Matthew> Something which came up in one of the hallway discussions at
> Matthew> the kernelsummit was that a lot of the architecture
> Matthew> maintainers would find it more convenient if the
> Matthew> arch-specific header files were moved from include/asm-
> Matthew> to arch//include. S
> "Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> Something which came up in one of the hallway discussions at
Matthew> the kernelsummit was that a lot of the architecture
Matthew> maintainers would find it more convenient if the
Matthew> arch-specific header files were moved
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Would anyone have a problem with this change?
UML already has a arch/um/include for private headers that the rest of the
kernel is not allowed to see.
It would mean moving it, which is not a big deal.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this
3 matches
Mail list logo
