On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 22:50:04 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[...]
> I just tracked it down to hdparm. Version 6.9 (the one in Debian stable)
> doesn't work right with libata. Version 7.5 (the one in Debian unstable)
> works fine.
>
> So, at least in my side, there are *no* kerne
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> >>HDAPS support is available, revision is MB2IA60A.
> >
> >That would usually rule out the possibility of it being the firmware, but
> >we
> >have different disks, so differ
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
HDAPS support is available, revision is MB2IA60A.
That would usually rule out the possibility of it being the firmware, but we
have different disks, so different firmware.
It looks like I will have to try 2.6.22 t
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> HDAPS support is available, revision is MB2IA60A.
That would usually rule out the possibility of it being the firmware, but we
have different disks, so different firmware.
It looks like I will have to try 2.6.22 to know for sure.
--
"One disk to
On 2007.06.06 18:03:37 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > On 2007.06.06 13:48:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > I am also using libata PIIX like the first person reporting the problem,
> > > but
> > > it is a PATA drive beh
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.06.06 13:48:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > > On 2007.06.06 12:44:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > > > >I use
On 2007.06.06 13:48:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > On 2007.06.06 12:44:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > > >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.06.06 12:44:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
> > > >Seagate ST98823AS drive.
> > >
> > > Yes, that's expected if the
On 2007.06.06 12:44:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
> > >Seagate ST98823AS drive.
> >
> > Yes, that's expected if the drive rejects the command.
>
> Are *all* SATA drives rej
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
> >Seagate ST98823AS drive.
>
> Yes, that's expected if the drive rejects the command.
Are *all* SATA drives rejecting the command? Mine doesn't accept it,
either. And it should, AFAIK, unl
Tino Keitel wrote:
Hi,
I tried to enable acoustic management on my SATA drive, because
hdparm -I reported a recommended value of 128, and a current value
of 0 (off).
I did this:
$ sudo hdparm -M 128 /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
setting acoustic management to 128
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD:ACOUSTIC failed: Input/o
11 matches
Mail list logo
