Re: Big reserved mappings on x86_64

2007-04-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Apr 25 2007 11:30, Eric Dumazet wrote: >Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:42:20AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> > I actually took a look at `pmap $$`, which reveals that a lot of shared >> > libraries map 2044K or 2048K unreadable-unwritable-private >>

Re: Big reserved mappings on x86_64

2007-04-25 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:49:31 -0400 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:42:20AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > I actually took a look at `pmap $$`, which reveals that a lot of shared > > libraries map 2044K or 2048K unreadable-unwritable-private > > mappings...

Re: Big reserved mappings on x86_64

2007-04-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:42:20AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > I actually took a look at `pmap $$`, which reveals that a lot of shared > libraries map 2044K or 2048K unreadable-unwritable-private > mappings...for _what_ purpose? > > 10:37 opteron:~ > pmap $$ > 4403: bash > START SIZE