On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:53:31 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> scx200_i2c does depend on i2c-algo-bit so there is really very little
> code inside scx200_i2c itself. Does the new driver replace
> i2c-algo-bit as well or does it use it?
It uses it.
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:49:49AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> This is getting confusing... :) On the sc1200 and and GX1, the ACB
> bus is accessed through ISA ports. There is no ISA on the cs5535/cs5536
> companion chips (accompanying the GX and LX processors), and the ACB
> is accessed throug
On 27/04/07 10:02 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:03:23 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:39:20AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > > There is no ISA on the LX.
> >
> > Isn't LPC a good equivalent?
>
> I suspect that Jordan meant that there is no LPC
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:02:04AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I suspect that Jordan meant that there is no LPC either. In which case,
> of course, there's no way scx200_acb will ever work on that system, and
> GPIO-based bitbanging is the way to go. Just using i2c-gpio rather than
> scx200_i2c.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:03:23 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:39:20AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > There is no ISA on the LX.
>
> Isn't LPC a good equivalant?
I suspect that Jordan meant that there is no LPC either. In which case,
of course, there's no way scx200_acb
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:39:20AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> There is no ISA on the LX.
Isn't LPC a good equivalant?
--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kern
On 26/04/07 09:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> These return all 0x00
>
> On the Geode LX800 where scx200_acb does work all 4 commands return all
> 0xff.
There is no ISA on the LX.
--
Jordan Crouse
Senior Linux Engineer
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> After digging some more, I finally managed to get my hands back on it:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-April/016009.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-May/016053.html
>
> This isn't "r
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:47:10 -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 23/04/07 11:42 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I seem to remember there has been a patch floating around to
> > auto-detect the right ports back in June 2006, but it seems to have
> > been lost somehow. Jordan, do you remember?
>
> I don
On 23/04/07 11:42 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I seem to remember there has been a patch floating around to
> auto-detect the right ports back in June 2006, but it seems to have
> been lost somehow. Jordan, do you remember?
I don't remember that, and Google isn't helping, either. Regardless,
rand
On 22/04/07 11:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> scx200_acb doesn't detect any device that it can drive (nothing in dmesg
> at all when loaded) on the sc1200. I believe the main changes that
> happened to scx200_acb was adding support for the newer CS chipsets,
> such as the one used with t
On 19/04/07 08:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Len,
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:42:56 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Otherwise it looks OK to me, I take the patch. If others have comments
> > > or objections, just speak up a
12 matches
Mail list logo
