H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction.
>>>
>>> If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it
>>> would speed things up.
>>
>> cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian
Thought some more about this, and since this probably means gcc will
generate this for userspace code as well nowadays, tm5800 should
probably be downgraded to a 586-class machine. Hence the Linux policy
of promoting it to a 686-class machine for having CMOV is actually
incorrect, it doesn't h
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Are you sure that build matches the bug report?
urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer
2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3
The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,
spe
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Are you sure that build matches the bug report?
urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer
2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3
The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,
spe
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Are you sure that build matches the bug report?
urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer
2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3
> The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,
> specifically inside the
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction.
If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would
speed things up.
cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux
~/publi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction.
>
> If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would
> speed things up.
cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux
~/public_html/
http://ch
maximilian attems wrote:
> on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor.
FWIW, I misremembered the model number. It's a not-so-shiny P2110.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
maximilian attems wrote:
sure, ack.
so i'll circumvent bugzilla and add the new x86 maintainers
on cc to let them know about the 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc1 boot error
on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor.
http://bugs.debian.org/464962
686 config attached.
INT 6 is #UD, undefined
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:52:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > thanks for quick feedback, have prebuild 2.6.25-rc1-git2
> > (they contain the security fix, but don't seem to suspend here)
> > anyway please test for boot
> > -> http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/2.6.25
10 matches
Mail list logo
