Paul Mackerras writes:
> Albert D. Cahalan writes:
>> Even Red Hat 7 only has the 2.3.11 version.
>>
>> The 2.4.xx series is supposed to be stable. If there is
>> any way you could add a compatibility hack, please do so.
>
> Stable != backwards compatible to the year dot.
I know. It means that y
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: Bug in ppp_async.c
> Albert D. Cahalan writes:
>
> > Even Red Hat 7 only has the 2.3.11 v
Albert D. Cahalan writes:
> Even Red Hat 7 only has the 2.3.11 version.
>
> The 2.4.xx series is supposed to be stable. If there is any way
> you could add a compatibility hack, please do so.
Stable != backwards compatible to the year dot. ppp-2.4.0 has been
out for over 5 months now. Adding
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Paul Mackerras writes:
> > I'll bet you're using an old pppd. You need version 2.4.0 of pppd,
> > available from ftp://linuxcare.com.au/pub/ppp/, as documented in the
> > Documentation/Changes file.
>
> Even Red Hat 7 only has the 2.3.11 version.
Paul Mackerras writes:
> Jo l'Indien writes:
>> I found a bug in the 2.4.1-pre10 version of ppp_async.c
>>
>> In fact, a lot of ioctl are not supported any more,
>> whih make the pppd start fail.
>
> I'll bet you're using an old pppd. You need version 2.4.0 of pppd,
> available from ftp://linuxc
Jo l'Indien writes:
> I found a bug in the 2.4.1-pre10 version of ppp_async.c
>
> In fact, a lot of ioctl are not supported any more,
> whih make the pppd start fail.
I'll bet you're using an old pppd. You need version 2.4.0 of pppd,
available from ftp://linuxcare.com.au/pub/ppp/, as documente
6 matches
Mail list logo
