On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, George Talbot wrote:
> I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
> most common system calls with
>
> do
> {
> rv = __some_system_call__(...);
> } while (rv == -1 && errno == EINTR);
welcome to Unix. this is how
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:13:25 -0500 (EST)
From: George Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
most common system calls with
do
{
rv = __some_system_call__(...);
}
I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
most common system calls with
do
{
rv = __some_system_call__(...);
} while (rv == -1 && errno == EINTR);
are broken. Especially if those programs don't use signals. The problem
that
I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
most common system calls with
do
{
rv = __some_system_call__(...);
} while (rv == -1 errno == EINTR);
are broken. Especially if those programs don't use signals. The problem
that
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:13:25 -0500 (EST)
From: George Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
most common system calls with
do
{
rv = __some_system_call__(...);
}
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, George Talbot wrote:
I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
most common system calls with
do
{
rv = __some_system_call__(...);
} while (rv == -1 errno == EINTR);
welcome to Unix. this is how it is, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
