On Thursday July 7 2005 11:46 am, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Sheo Shanker Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I will appreciate your help in eliminating a disturbing wide
> > variation (by a factors of 2 to 2.5) in the execution time of a test
> > (execution benchmark) program under identical condi
Sheo Shanker Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> When the repaired machine was started, I began to notice the disturbing wide
> variation and the frequect significant slow down of the machine as exhibited
> by the factor of 2 to 2.5 increased execution time of the test program as
> descri
Sheo Shanker Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I will appreciate your help in eliminating a disturbing wide
> variation (by a factors of 2 to 2.5) in the execution time of a test
> (execution benchmark) program under identical conditions even when
> the machine is freshly started (rebooted) and
(please do not top-post)
07.07.2005 10:03, Sheo Shanker Prasad wrote/a écrit:
Dear David,
The program is an atmospheric chemistry-transport modeling code that computes
the distributions of atmospheric species (e.g., ozone) as a function of
latitude and altitude and how that changes with time.
Dear David,
The program is an atmospheric chemistry-transport modeling code that computes
the distributions of atmospheric species (e.g., ozone) as a function of
latitude and altitude and how that changes with time.
Thanks for taking time to think about my problem. I greatly appreciate it.
I h
From: Sheo Shanker Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:44:53 -0700
> I will appreciate your help in eliminating a disturbing wide variation (by a
> factors of 2 to 2.5) in the execution time of a test (execution benchmark)
> program under identical conditions even when the machin
6 matches
Mail list logo
