On Nov 29, 2007 9:11 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These are good points. However, on the Slack 10.2 box I repeated these
> measurements with all userspace code quiesced. No daemons running except
> for those that are kernel threads. Secondly, I do run dynticks kernels on
> other Slackware 10
On Nov 28, 2007 6:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I built the same dynticks-enabled 2.6.23.9 kernel on a nearly identical
> system with minor changes to reflect the slightly different hardware.
> These two systems have identical MSI E7210 MasterX FA6R motherboards (same
> model and revision.) T
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:36:32 -0600 (CST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Question: Why is ksoftirqd eating about 5 to 10 percent of my CPU on an idle
> > system? The problem occurs if I config the kernel with tickless
> > support (i.e. CONFIG_TICK_ONES
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:36:17 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Question: Why is ksoftirqd eating about 5 to 10 percent of my CPU on an idle
> > system? The problem occurs if I config the kernel with tickless
> > support (i.e. CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y). (T
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:36:32 -0600 (CST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Question: Why is ksoftirqd eating about 5 to 10 percent of my CPU on an idle
> system? The problem occurs if I config the kernel with tickless
> support (i.e. CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y). (Thanks to "oprofile" for putting me
> onto th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Robert,
I've attached additional detail on the config of the misbehaving system
including output from oprofile and PowerTop. PowerTop output leads me to
believe that maybe this is an interaction between my bridged ethernet
setup and dynticks? Hmmm...
Don't know a
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:36:17 -0600
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Question: Why is ksoftirqd eating about 5 to 10 percent of my CPU
> > on an idle system? The problem occurs if I config the kernel with
> > tickless support (i.e. CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y). (T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: Why is ksoftirqd eating about 5 to 10 percent of my CPU on an idle
system? The problem occurs if I config the kernel with tickless
support (i.e. CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y). (Thanks to "oprofile" for putting me
onto this.)
I have noted this same problem on kernel v
8 matches
Mail list logo