On 5/3/07, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe"
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>>
>>> > I find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe"
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>>
>>> > I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote:
On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> userland tools that provide the same
On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> userland tools that provide the same funcionality, which one should I
> use?
I doubt us
El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> userland tools that provide the same funcionality, which one should I
> use?
I doubt users care about kernel's design; however the lack of un
5 matches
Mail list logo