Ashok Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is it not possible for ia64's ->set_affinity() handler to do this deferring?
> >
>
> There are other places where we re-program, and its fine to call the
> current version of set_affinity directly, like when we are doing cpu offline
> and trying to forc
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:59:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ashok Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> "ia64" is preferred, please. Nobody knows what an IPF is.
Right!. Sorry about that.
>
>
> Is it not possible for ia64's ->set_affinity() handler to do this deferring?
>
There are oth
Ashok Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew/Tony
>
> This patch is required for IPF to perform deferred write to rte's when
> affinity is programmed via /proc. These entries can only be programmed when
> interrupt is pending.
"ia64" is preferred, please. Nobody knows what an IPF is.
>
3 matches
Mail list logo