Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007, Peter Williams wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt c
On Friday 13 July 2007, Peter Williams wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 13 July 2007, Peter Williams wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 18:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For the most part, it seems you guys have resolved most of the
> > issues that we ran into as well (e.g. early-flush-tlb, relocated
> > die-notifier, etc, come to mind). I found one patc
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 04:43 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> we are working on something in this area :) Stay tuned ...
> >
> >I've just been reviewing these patches and have spotted an error in the
> >file mm/slob.c at lines 500-501 whereby a non existent variable "c" is
> >referenced. The attache
On Friday 13 July 2007, Peter Williams wrote:
>Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
>
> I ju
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
I just wanted to let you guys know that our te
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:25 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> > we are working on something in this area :) Stay tuned ...
>
> I've just been reviewing these patches and have spotted an error in the
> file mm/slob.c at lines 500-501 whereby a non existent variable "c" is
> referenced. The attached p
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 18:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ok. Make sure you check rt2 as well - and note that it's not fully
> bisectable with PREEMPT_RT enabled (but should probably be fully
> bisectable with PREEMPT_RT disabled). So check out
* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the most part, it seems you guys have resolved most of the
> issues that we ran into as well (e.g. early-flush-tlb, relocated
> die-notifier, etc, come to mind). I found one patch that was missing
> that allows debug configurations to build
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> great! We had the upstream -rt port to .22 in the works too, it was just
> held up by the hpet breakage - which Thomas managed to fix earlier
> today. I've released the 2.6.22.1-rt1 patch to the usual place:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo
* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
> > >
> > > I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of
>
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
> >
> > I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of
> > the 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available. [.
* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
>
> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of
> the 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available. [...]
great! We had the upstream -rt port to .22 in the works too
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:58 +, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
>
> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
> 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available.
Ok, we have incorporated some of the feedback from y
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 07:14 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > Note also that we find that the resulting kernel does not boot on some
> > T60p thinkpads without "acpi=off". We are still investigating the root
> > cause here.
>
> Try "
Hi All,
Sorry for my poor english.
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
[...]
> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
> 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available.
Great! Thanks a lot for effort!
I'm doing the same thing and i don't h
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Note also that we find that the resulting kernel does not boot on some
> T60p thinkpads without "acpi=off". We are still investigating the root
> cause here.
Try "nohpet" for now. I'm investigating it on the -hrt side as well.
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:58 +, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
>
> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
> 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available.
FYI: Due to an internal mis-communication I thought
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
>
> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
> 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available. It in no way should be
> construed as a substitute for
19 matches
Mail list logo
