Re: Full dynticks needs evtdesc set before marking cpu online.

2013-05-13 Thread Robin Holt
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 04:04:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

Re: Full dynticks needs evtdesc set before marking cpu online.

2013-05-13 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 13 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thomas, >

Re: Full dynticks needs evtdesc set before marking cpu online.

2013-05-13 Thread Robin Holt
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > > > We are seeing failures booting medium

Re: Full dynticks needs evtdesc set before marking cpu online.

2013-05-13 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 8 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > We are seeing failures booting medium sized machines which I think is > > > a change in expectations that dyntick put

Re: Full dynticks needs evtdesc set before marking cpu online.

2013-05-13 Thread Robin Holt
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > > > Thomas, > > > > We are seeing failures booting medium sized machines which I think is > > a change in expectations that dyntick put on x86's start_secondary. > > > > During boot of cpus

Re: Full dynticks needs evtdesc set before marking cpu online.

2013-05-13 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Robin Holt wrote: > Thomas, > > We are seeing failures booting medium sized machines which I think is > a change in expectations that dyntick put on x86's start_secondary. > > During boot of cpus, we see an occassional panic in tick_do_broadcast at http://lkml.indiana.edu/hy