2015-06-03 13:20 GMT+08:00 Tejun Heo :
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:13:44AM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>> this means i need create kthread like this :
>>
>> struct task_struct *kworker_task = kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn,
>> &worker, "nvme%d", dev->instance);
>> kworker_task->flags &= ~PF_NOFREEZE;
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:13:44AM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
> this means i need create kthread like this :
>
> struct task_struct *kworker_task = kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn,
> &worker, "nvme%d", dev->instance);
> kworker_task->flags &= ~PF_NOFREEZE;
> is it safe to do like this ?
It's not.
>
2015-06-01 19:40 GMT+08:00 Tejun Heo :
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:05:58PM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>> I notice that kthread_worker_fn() call try_to_freeze() function,
>> but it don't make itself to be a freezable kthread,
>> kthread default behavior is not freezable, we should change i
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:05:58PM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
> I notice that kthread_worker_fn() call try_to_freeze() function,
> but it don't make itself to be a freezable kthread,
> kthread default behavior is not freezable, we should change it if
> want try_to_freeze() work correctly.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
