On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 12:45 +, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Phil Oester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:10:05PM +, Russell King wrote:
> >> Doesn't matter. The problem is that dwmw2's NS16550A patch (from ages
> >> ago) changes the prescaler setting for this device so w
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:45:51PM +, Paul Slootman wrote:
> We have a variety of Dell rackmount systems, also on Cyclades, and see
> this mess everywhere.
>
> I had reported this problem a little while ago, see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111036598927105&w=2
> but unfortu
Phil Oester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:10:05PM +, Russell King wrote:
>> Doesn't matter. The problem is that dwmw2's NS16550A patch (from ages
>> ago) changes the prescaler setting for this device so we can use the
>> higher speed baud rates. This means any progra
> >
> > Seems like you are correct, given the below patch fixes the garbage
> > output for me.
>
> David,
>
> Is this patch ok for you?
Just an aside, I've had this patch in my own internal tree for over a
year I never thought it would be kernel acceptable... but I noticed
this problem a long ti
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:36:52AM -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:10:05PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > Doesn't matter. The problem is that dwmw2's NS16550A patch (from ages
> > ago) changes the prescaler setting for this device so we can use the
> > higher speed baud rates
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:10:05PM +, Russell King wrote:
> Doesn't matter. The problem is that dwmw2's NS16550A patch (from ages
> ago) changes the prescaler setting for this device so we can use the
> higher speed baud rates. This means any programmed divisor (programmed
> at early serial con
Hi,
I have come across a 16550A myself (in VMware) and so, tested it.
Linux reports it as a "16550A" while OpenBSD says it's a "NS16550A" --
output to this serial console (vmware: file) works fine, though.
My real box's serial is also a 16550A but havenot tested that- got no cable.
Jan Engelha
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:37:29PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
> > serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
> > Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 8 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
Garbage here
Sorry -- I was relying upon my (flawed) memory of the
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:37:29PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > But intererstingly, on identical boxes, the garbage only appears on
> > those hooked up to a PortMaster device - those using a Cyclades never
> > display this problem. (???)
>
> Sorry, I don't understand your scenarios. Can you exp
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 07:55:49AM -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:10:05PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > Doesn't matter. The problem is that dwmw2's NS16550A patch (from ages
> > ago) changes the prescaler setting for this device so we can use the
> > higher speed baud rate
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:10:05PM +, Russell King wrote:
> Doesn't matter. The problem is that dwmw2's NS16550A patch (from ages
> ago) changes the prescaler setting for this device so we can use the
> higher speed baud rates. This means any programmed divisor (programmed
> at early serial c
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:16:09AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >Well, serial_core seems to think so:
> >
> >Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 8 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
> >ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a NS16550A
> >ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a NS16550A
> >ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8
Il Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:16:09AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt ha scritto:
> >Well, serial_core seems to think so:
> >
> >Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 8 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
> >ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a NS16550A
> >ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a NS16550A
> >ttyS0 at I/O
>Well, serial_core seems to think so:
>
>Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 8 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
>ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a NS16550A
>ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a NS16550A
>ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a NS16550A
Does it work if you set the baud rate manually, as
Il Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:38:53PM +, Russell King ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:24:15PM +0100, Luca wrote:
> > I attached a null modem cable to my notebook and I'm seeing garbage as
> > soon as the serial driver is loaded. I tried booting with init=/bin/bash
> > to be sure that it'
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:24:15PM +0100, Luca wrote:
> I attached a null modem cable to my notebook and I'm seeing garbage as
> soon as the serial driver is loaded. I tried booting with init=/bin/bash
> to be sure that it's not some rc script doing strange things to the
> serial port, but this did
16 matches
Mail list logo
