Re: Generating valid random .configs

2001-05-30 Thread Alan Cox
> > 2 months since I last did that, so I should do it again soon.. > > Some things cannot be properly fixed in CML1. > "$CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC" = "y" -a "$CONFIG_PROC_FS" = "n" > is a good example. Thats a tool not a language limit. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri

Re: Generating valid random .configs

2001-05-30 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:29:42AM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > Some things cannot be properly fixed in CML1. > "$CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC" = "y" -a "$CONFIG_PROC_FS" = "n" > is a good example. > This one has gone away btw But in general, the current TOOLS cannot do forward depende

Re: Generating valid random .configs

2001-05-30 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
"Arjan van de Ven wrote:" > Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > > Recently, I posted a request here to send your .config files and I > > received a good number of them. (thanks!). > > > > Now I want to generate even more different configurations, and a random > > .config generator would be ideal. I

Re: Generating valid random .configs

2001-05-30 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > Recently, I posted a request here to send your .config files and I > received a good number of them. (thanks!). > > Now I want to generate even more different configurations, and a random > .config generator would be ideal. If I write a program which randomly > out