Re: IRQ conflicts

2001-02-13 Thread Brian Gerst
Andrey Panin wrote: > > Hi Brian. > > I'm sorry, patch itself was not attached in previous post :( > Yes, this does fix that part of the problem. There is still the matter of the class code being wrong but I have ideas on how to fix that. --

Re: IRQ conflicts

2001-02-13 Thread Andrey Panin
Hi Brian. I'm sorry, patch itself was not attached in previous post :( Best regards. -- Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]| PGP key: http://www.orbita1.ru/~pazke/AndreyPanin.asc --- /linux/arch/i386/kernel/pci-pc.c.orig Mon Feb 12 02

Re: IRQ conflicts

2001-02-13 Thread Andrey Panin
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:06:52PM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > > > > ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20010208] > > > ACPI: SCI (IRQ9) allocation failed > > > ACPI: Subsystem enable failed > > > Trying to free free IRQ9 > > > > That seems to indicate acpi is freeing a fre

Re: IRQ conflicts

2001-02-10 Thread Brian Gerst
Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20010208] > > ACPI: SCI (IRQ9) allocation failed > > ACPI: Subsystem enable failed > > Trying to free free IRQ9 > > That seems to indicate acpi is freeing a free irq. Turn ACPI off. Its a > good bet it will fix any random irq/driver proble

Re: IRQ conflicts

2001-02-10 Thread Alan Cox
> > ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20010208] > ACPI: SCI (IRQ9) allocation failed > ACPI: Subsystem enable failed > Trying to free free IRQ9 That seems to indicate acpi is freeing a free irq. Turn ACPI off. Its a good bet it will fix any random irq/driver problem right now - To unsubscribe from