Hi Andi and Arnaldo,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 02:25:19 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> f1 tcall.c:9
>> main tcall.c:17
>> main tcall.c:17
>> main tcall.c:16
>> main tcall.c:16
>> f1 tcall.c:12
>> f1 tcall.c:12
>> f2 tcall.c:6
>> f2 tcall.c:4
>> f1 tcall.c:1
> f1 tcall.c:9
> main tcall.c:17
> main tcall.c:17
> main tcall.c:16
> main tcall.c:16
> f1 tcall.c:12
> f1 tcall.c:12
> f2 tcall.c:6
> f2 tcall.c:4
> f1 tcall.c:11
> f1 tcall.c:11
> f2 tcall.c:6
> f2 tcall.c:4
> f1 tcall.c:10
>
Em Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:33:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:48:22PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > > directory since I'm comparing the output of --stdio, --tui and --gtk,
> > > > since it looks --gtk is wrong, still unsure about what the problem is i
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:33:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:48:22PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:04:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:10:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > es
Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:50:41PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > [root@zoo ~]#
> >
> > Rebuilding with DEBUG=1 I get this backtrace:
>
> Ok it crashes inside libbfd while resolving the line.
> Not much I can do about it.
> Could file a bug with the binuti
Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:48:22PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:04:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:10:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > > >
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> [root@zoo ~]#
>
> Rebuilding with DEBUG=1 I get this backtrace:
Ok it crashes inside libbfd while resolving the line.
Not much I can do about it.
Could file a bug with the binutils people, if you have a test case?
>
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:04:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:10:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > > BUILD_BUG_ON then?
> > > >
> > > > sounds gut
> > >
> > > hum, acme/
Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:10:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > BUILD_BUG_ON then?
> > >
> > > sounds gut
> >
> > hum, acme/perf/core changed and so has the compile error ;-)
> > we dont overload the , so the ker
> > > I'm getting compile error for DEBUG=1
>
> > looks like the BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG does not work correctly with -O6 we use
>
> Yeah, I'll probably just take the brute force approach Andi originally
> used and switch to BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG once we get it working in the tools/
> environment, i.e. using
Em Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:00:07PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > > [Reworks to address a
Em Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON then?
> >
> > sounds gut
>
> hum, acme/perf/core changed and so has the compile error ;-)
> we dont overload the , so the kernel one got
> included, which is wrong.. attached patch fixes that
I had fixed this but no
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:23:23AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:21:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:00:07 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:21:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:00:07 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> > Em Wed, Nov 12, 201
Hi Jiri,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:00:07 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
>> > > [Reworks to address all
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > [Reworks to address all the review feedback. Rebased to latest tree]
> > > [Just a repost a
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > [Reworks to address all the review feedback. Rebased to latest tree]
> > [Just a repost after a rebase]
> > [Even more review feedback and some bugs address
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > [Reworks to address all the review feedback. Rebased to latest tree]
> > [Just a repost after a rebase]
> > [Even more review feedback and some bugs address
Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> [Reworks to address all the review feedback. Rebased to latest tree]
> [Just a repost after a rebase]
> [Even more review feedback and some bugs addressed.]
> [Only port to changes in perf/core. No other changes.]
> [Rebase to latest
19 matches
Mail list logo
