On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 13:58, Jan Stancek wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Following three test cases reported as regression on Linux mainline kernel
> > on x86_64, arm64, arm and i386
> >
> > ltp-syscalls-tests:
> > * ioctl_loop01
> > * mknod07
>
> Test updated:
>
> htt
- Original Message -
> Following three test cases reported as regression on Linux mainline kernel
> on x86_64, arm64, arm and i386
>
> ltp-syscalls-tests:
> * ioctl_loop01
> * mknod07
Test updated:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/13fcfa2d6bdd1fb71c4528b471
Hi Martijn
Hi Naresh,
I just sent a patch and cc'd you. I verified all the loop tests pass
again with that patch.
I think you want to say "without". I verified the ioctl_loop01 fails
with faf1d25440 ("loop: Clean up LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling").
This kernel commit breaks old behaviou
Hi Naresh,
I just sent a patch and cc'd you. I verified all the loop tests pass
again with that patch.
Thanks,
Martijn
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:10 PM Martijn Coenen wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> I suspect the loop failures are due to
> faf1d25440d6ad06d509dada4b6fe62fea844370 ("loop: Clean up
> LO
Hi Naresh,
I suspect the loop failures are due to
faf1d25440d6ad06d509dada4b6fe62fea844370 ("loop: Clean up
LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling"), I will investigate and get back
to you.
Thanks,
Martijn
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:19 PM Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> + linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
>
> On
+ linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 22:47, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> Following three test cases reported as regression on Linux mainline kernel
> on x86_64, arm64, arm and i386
>
> ltp-syscalls-tests:
> * ioctl_loop01
> * mknod07
> * setns01
>
> git repo: https://git
6 matches
Mail list logo
