Re: Linux 2.2.18pre2

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "David" == David S Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:01:18 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Cox > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >o Acenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg) David> This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition, David> but no actual code is changed.

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre2

2000-09-01 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to David S. Miller: >o Acenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg) > > This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition, > but no actual code is changed. How can this be? :-) The bug fix was already in. The log message is misleading. -- Chip Sa

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre2

2000-09-01 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:01:18 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> oAcenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg) This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition, but no actual code is changed. How can this be? :-) Later, David S.

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre2

2000-09-01 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Albert D. Cahalan: > The last time this issue came up, it was discovered that Windows 9x > does not use the same generation rules as Windows NT. Well, making the rules the same as NT would be fine, I suspect. Even better would be a mount option, I think, since there will always be so

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre2

2000-09-01 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Alan Cox writes: > o Make vfat use the same generation rules as (H. Kawaguchi, > in windows 9xChip Salzenberg) I doubt this is obviously correct. The last time this issue came up, it was discovered that Windows 9x does not use the same generatio