Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression?

2005-08-03 Thread Jan De Luyck
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 12:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Please try to ad the ec_polling parameter to the kernel command line and > retest. That helps a lot. Thanks, it's back to the 'old way'. Jan -- ...Deep Hack Mode -- that mysterious and frightening state of consciousness where Mortal Use

Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression?

2005-08-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 2 of August 2005 08:43, Jan De Luyck wrote: > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:07, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, one more in the series towards final 2.6.13. > > One thing that seems like a regression: doing > > $ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/info > > causes a two-second pause and then gi

Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5

2005-08-02 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Aug 01, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Give it a good testing, I'm hoping this can really turn into 2.6.13. aic doesnt work anymore, the poweroff thing should also be fixed in some way. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112180348617932&w=2 (google did not find that posting, but it

Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression?

2005-08-01 Thread Jan De Luyck
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:07, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, one more in the series towards final 2.6.13. One thing that seems like a regression: doing $ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/info causes a two-second pause and then gives me the information, while in 2.6.12.3 that was near-instant. $ dat

Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5

2005-08-01 Thread Jan De Luyck
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:07, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, one more in the series towards final 2.6.13. > > This one is small enough that both shortlog and diffstat fit comfortably: > no big architecture updates or anything like that. Some input, x86-64 and > ppc updates, and various fairly small