Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

2007-01-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:35:21AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:25:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > There's already a CVE number for > > "i386: save/restore eflags in context switch". > > > > Are there also CVE numbers for the equivale

Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

2007-01-07 Thread Chuck Ebbert
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:25:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > There's already a CVE number for > "i386: save/restore eflags in context switch". > > Are there also CVE numbers for the equivalent x86_64 patch and > "x86_64: fix ia32 syscall count"? Sorry, my Web access

Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

2007-01-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 05:05:55PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:53:08 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Changes since 2.6.16.36: > > ... > > If you're not going to merge the critical x86 fixes I sent, > I won't bother sending anything mor

Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

2006-12-31 Thread Chuck Ebbert
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:53:08 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Changes since 2.6.16.36: > ... If you're not going to merge the critical x86 fixes I sent, I won't bother sending anything more. -- MBTI: IXTP - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe