Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:39:45 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (P

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Adrian Bunk napisał(a): > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, >>> Michal Piotrowski wrote: Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hype

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I pushed out the

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, > >Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> > >> Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed > >> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > Note that ping is handled in interrupt or softirq context. So something has > > locked up. Try without X? Or perhaps attack a serial console/netconsole, and > > when it hangs, use Sysrq to dump the process' states. > > I already did this > http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/biti

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > > > patches and ta

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 17/03/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 16 2007 19:55, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 16 2007 17:13, Chris Friesen wrote: > > This would seem to be a bug in the build system then. Or are you > supposed to "make clean" after every config change? No. When .config is changed, include/linux/config/ is updated, which causes things that depends on it one or the other way to rebu

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 16 2007 19:55, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 >> > probably leaked into mainline. >> > >> > Fsck! >>

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Chris Friesen
Randy Dunlap wrote: allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: "default_idle" [arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko] undefined! WARNING: "machine_real_restart" [arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 2 Please ignore. I think that this was the result of doing '

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > > Oops. I'm

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > Oops. I'm a scatter-brain. allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: "default_idle" [ar

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > > Oops. I'm a scatte

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > Oops. I'm a scatter-brain. > > Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just lo

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1684 The patch wasn't merged to rc4. I know. I use patched 2.6.21-

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 16/03/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1684 The patch wasn't merged to rc4. Or, do you mean the bug is still present even with the patch? Takashi - To unsubscr

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 > probably leaked into mainline.

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi, I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 probably leaked into mainline. Fsck! http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc4/git-conf

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just lots of random > fixes. I'm hoping that we've seriously cut down on the regression list, > and I'd ask everybody who is on Adrian's list to please re-verify their > regressi