On 04/16/2018 12:34 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
>> trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
>
> .. and I also verified that it actually fixes the problem Sh
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds to
> > go, but I guess I don't even need it.
>
> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
> trivial and obvious a
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
> trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
.. and I also verified that it actually fixes the problem Shuah
reported. Not that there really was any question abou
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds to
> go, but I guess I don't even need it.
Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 18:55:38 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> End result: we actually removed more lines than we added:
>
> 13538 files changed, 627723 insertions(+), 818855 deletions(-)
>
> which is probably a first. Ever. In the history of the universe. Or at
> least kernel releases.
For the c
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Dave Hansen
wrote:
>
> Joerg just found and fixed something that would be poked by the x86
> selftests:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/16/230
Yup.
And that silly bug explains the all-ones PTE.
I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds
On 04/16/2018 10:56 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see *why* it would be badly set up, and that test works fine
>> for me, though.
>
> AHHAH!
>
> I'm wrong. I can see it too. My desktop was running 18b7fd1c93e5 (my
> kernel fro
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I don't see *why* it would be badly set up, and that test works fine
> for me, though.
AHHAH!
I'm wrong. I can see it too. My desktop was running 18b7fd1c93e5 (my
kernel from Saturday, I hadn't rebooted it since), but I had 4.17-rc1
in
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> [ 884.496588] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fe810030
This is the LDT remap area.
> [ 884.496614] Oops: 0009 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
This is RSVD + P, so it's a system read access that got a protection
fault due to res
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:01:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > We actually have a fair amount of other removal and cleanups too. I
> > was somewhat pleasantly surprised by the number of pull requests that
> > actually ended up rem
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> We actually have a fair amount of other removal and cleanups too. I
> was somewhat pleasantly surprised by the number of pull requests that
> actually ended up removing a lot of lines. Some of it was staging
> drivers that finally gave up th
11 matches
Mail list logo
