On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:42:24PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:38 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:33:40PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:27 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:57
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:42:24PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:38 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:33:40PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:27 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:57
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:38 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:33:40PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:27 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:33:40PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:27 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:47:07PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:31 PM
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:27 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:47:07PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:31 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:47:07PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:31 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Torvalds
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:47:07PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:31 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Torvalds
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Qemu test results:
> > > >
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:45:46PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:24 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:05 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/12/21 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:24 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:05 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/12/21 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > > Yes, I think this is the real issue here.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:24 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:05 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > On 4/12/21 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > Yes, I think this is the real issue here. This smells like some memory
> > > corruption.
> > >
> > > In my traces,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:05 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On 4/12/21 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> > Yes, I think this is the real issue here. This smells like some memory
> > corruption.
> >
> > In my traces, packet is correctly received in AF_PACKET queue.
> >
> > I have checked
On 4/12/21 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
[ ... ]
> Yes, I think this is the real issue here. This smells like some memory
> corruption.
>
> In my traces, packet is correctly received in AF_PACKET queue.
>
> I have checked the skb is well formed.
>
> But the user space seems to never call
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:31 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On 4/12/21 9:31 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Torvalds
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Qemu test results:
> >>> total: 460 pass: 459 fail:
On 4/12/21 9:31 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> Qemu test results:
>>> total: 460 pass: 459 fail: 1
>>> Failed tests:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:31 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > total: 460 pass: 459 fail: 1
> > > Failed tests:
> > >
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Qemu test results:
> > total: 460 pass: 459 fail: 1
> > Failed tests:
> > sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:ata:net,virtio-net:rootfs
> >
> > The failure bisects to
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Qemu test results:
> total: 460 pass: 459 fail: 1
> Failed tests:
> sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:ata:net,virtio-net:rootfs
>
> The failure bisects to commit 0f6925b3e8da ("virtio_net: Do not pull payload
> in
> skb->head").
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 09:28:28AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Qemu test results:
> > total: 460 pass: 459 fail: 1
> > Failed tests:
> > sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:ata:net,virtio-net:rootfs
> >
> > The failure
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 03:41:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Oh well. rc5 was big. rc6 was small. And now rc7 is big again. In
> fact, it's the biggest rc7 (at least in number of commits) we've had
> in the 5.x series.
>
> It's mostly due to networking fixes (of which rc6 had none), and none
Hallo
thanks all for the new kernel.
however, I see the following since linux-5.12-rc6 (when I started
testing 5.12)
I'm, as a non-developer, quiet not sure what the warning mean or better
how important they need to be taken, cause the box run's fine, so far.
I'm not sure if the warnings,
20 matches
Mail list logo
