Re: Make OLPC camera driver depend on x86.

2006-12-12 Thread Chuck Ebbert
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:39:56 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > [gads, an ia64 olpc, what a thought...] Teacher in front of a classroom full of students, all madly pedaling away on stationary bicycles: "Okay, class, just another hour of this and we can use the computers

Re: Make OLPC camera driver depend on x86.

2006-12-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:40:55PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > - depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 > > > > + depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 && X86_32 > > > > > > Any particular reason why? > > > > Just seemed odd to be offered the option when I was building > > an ia64 kernel given

Re: Make OLPC camera driver depend on x86.

2006-12-12 Thread Alan
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:39:56 -0500 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:12:52AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > -depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 > > > +depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 && X86_32 > > >

Re: Make OLPC camera driver depend on x86.

2006-12-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:12:52AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 > > + depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 && X86_32 > > Any particular reason why? Just seemed odd to be offered the option when I was building an ia64 k

Re: Make OLPC camera driver depend on x86.

2006-12-12 Thread Jonathan Corbet
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 > + depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2 && X86_32 Any particular reason why? I wouldn't be surprised to see Cafe used with other processors in the future. And I happen to know the driver works on x86-64 systems...or at leas