Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-29 Thread Nick Krause
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2014-07-29 13:08, Nick Krause wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Krause wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn >>> wrote: On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 201

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-29 Thread Austin S Hemmelgarn
On 2014-07-29 13:08, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Krause wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn >> wrote: >>> On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 a

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-29 Thread Nick Krause
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn > wrote: >> On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause >>> wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-28 Thread Nick Krause
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn >>> wrote: On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > On Sun, Jul

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-28 Thread Austin S Hemmelgarn
On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn >> wrote: >>> On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 07/2

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-28 Thread Nick Krause
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn > wrote: >> On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn >>> wrote: On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > This may b

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-28 Thread Nick Krause
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn >> wrote: >>> On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote: This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only u

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-28 Thread Austin S Hemmelgarn
On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn > wrote: >> On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote: >>> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only >>> using one core to compress. >>> Depending on the CPU used and the amo

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-28 Thread Hugo Mills
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:21:53PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn > wrote: > > On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > >> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only > >> using one core to compress. > >> Depending on th

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-27 Thread Nick Krause
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote: >> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only >> using one core to compress. >> Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can >> make this much fa

Re: Multi Core Support for compression in compression.c

2014-07-27 Thread Austin S Hemmelgarn
On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only > using one core to compress. > Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can > make this much faster > with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I